The good news at the moment is that small numbers of fresh
people are attending our churches, our diocesan safeguarding provision is more
robust than it has ever been, and, perhaps best of all, the Anglican Primates gathering
in Canterbury has come out with a robust statement against the prejudice faced
by gay people.
So, in the last week, we have begun to approach the half
dozen relatively new regular attenders at St Michael’s to see how many of them
would like to prepare for Confirmation in the summer, I’ve happened to touch on
two routine safeguarding activities (doing a standard identity check for one
person who visits homes for the elderly and responding to a letter about the
diocesan pastoral support provision for those effected by safeguarding
concerns), and I have received this:
The Primates condemned homophobic prejudice and violence and
resolved to work together to offer pastoral care and loving service
irrespective of sexual orientation. This conviction arises out of our
discipleship of Jesus Christ. The Primates reaffirmed their rejection of
criminal sanctions against same-sex attracted people. The Primates recognise that the Christian
church and within it the Anglican Communion have often acted in a way towards
people on the basis of their sexual orientation that has caused deep hurt.
Where this has happened they express their profound sorrow and affirm again
that God’s love for every human being is the same, regardless of their
sexuality, and that the church should never by its actions give any other
impression.
But I’m not sure that this is the impression which the
people of England or Grimsby have been given.
The news they have received in the last week is that the number of
attenders at Church of England services on a normal Sunday has dropped for the
first time below the psychologically important one million, individual cases of
sexual abuse in the Church of England continue to surface one by one, and the
majority of the Anglican Primates simply can’t abide those churches which
support provision for stable same-sex marriage.
Our 'mission listening' has long been picking up (alongside
their concern about the injustice of suffering in the world) their sense that
churchgoing wouldn’t touch their spiritual needs, that our apparent claims to holiness
are hyprocritical, and that our fundamentalism blinds us to the insights of
science and humanity today - and I imagine that news of smaller and more
elderly congregations, scandals and resistance to equality legislation seems to
confirm all this for them.
We know that the age profile of our regular attenders means
that in any given period the number of new ones is very unlikely to outnumber
the number who die. We know that it is
in part the rigour of our present safeguarding work which is bringing some old
scandals to light and to judgement. We
know that it is precisely the church’s attempt to be aware and creative at the
intersection of its tradition and encounters which produces the tensions we
find in seeing a shared way forward. Some
of these points have all been made on this Blog quite recently – but they
wouldn’t appear to be any more than special pleading to most people.
5 comments:
Are you now going to start weeding out all those church goers who object to homosexuality?
This is saying that we are not welcome.....we already know that.
Don't intend to dumb down my beliefs just to 'fit in'
Weeding: http://petermullins.blogspot.co.uk/2008/07/uprooting-unrighteous.html
Welcome: I'm sorry if you read any of this to imply anyone is less than welcome: I finished my last post writing as much about myself as anyone with whom I disagree "none of us have minds which are fully re-schemed, meta-morphosed, trans-formed and re-newed - there are layers of self deception, unreflective biblical literalism and secular assumption in there all the time alongside openness to God, Gospel-prompted priorities and society-inspired truths - it may actually be that it is our willingness to live together with those who fail like us which has been the most church defining thing about us all along". I think I repeated that thought when I ended my response to your comment on my last post "all of us are going to be wrong a lot of the time – but that doesn’t mean we are fanatics or faithless when we are".
Trouble is,I,and those of similar belief are thought of and addressed as fanatics.
... and those who feel that God is leading them to a different conclusion are sometimes thought of and addressed as faithless. We have to work at welcoming all.
Each persons faith walk is different as we all have a personal one to one relationship with God. We are all equal as 'people of faith' be it Christian or otherwise. Would be very boring if we all were the same wouldn't it. But that does not stop the challenges our walk brings.
Post a Comment