Some of the things which made Birmingham an important place
in which to train for ordination in the middle of the 1980s have been coming
back to me.
The Bishop of Lincoln happened to ask me about it at
breakfast earlier in the month and we named both Prof John Hull and Prof Frances
Young in the conversation.
And then the beautiful film Notes on Blindness was broadcast
on BBC 4 this week – a film based on the notes which John Hull was making at
the time as he explored the process of his going blind – and I was back in the
midst of those conversations thirty years ago.
The film brought him to the place in which an overwhelming experience
of grace gave him a sense of God placing a dark cloak over him – so that he had
to own his blindness as a gift (albeit one he did not want) and the only
question was then what he would do with it.
At the same time Frances Young, then a newly ordained Methodist Minister, was articulating her response to her son
Arthur’s severe disabilities using what I take to be the same ‘theological
method’.
But neither John Hull’s blindness nor Frances Young’s
son’s disability were simply ‘raw material’ for ‘theological reflection’ but rather
the realities integral to their lives, the lenses through which they read scripture,
the questions with which they interrogated tradition, the filter through which they sifted other Christians' explorations and experience.
It strikes me belatedly that my own ministerial formation
alongside these sorts of reflections explains why I find those who have a ‘problem
with suffering’ so puzzling - when they made me want every such encounter to be
the starting point which strips away previously easy answers and casual assumptions and
takes me somewhere new.
So facing the realities of dispossesion, bereavement, dementia, secular assumptions (thanks to Stephen Pattison, another of my Birmingham teachers of
the time) and of stillbirth are examples of the places where faith can be refined
and therefore renewed and validated rather than undermined and abandoned.
And just perhaps the Church of England is at such a moment with the gifts of both the
experience of those who wish to own the reality of their same-sex marriages before
God and of the painful division this has provoked.
It has brought our Archbishop this week to focus anew for those of whichever very different views of these realities:
It has brought our Archbishop this week to focus anew for those of whichever very different views of these realities:
No person is a problem, or an issue. People are made in the image of God. All of us, without exception, are loved and
called in Christ. There are no ‘problems’,
there are simply people... we need a
radical new Christian inclusion in the Church... this must be... based on good,
healthy, flourishing relationships, and in a proper 21st century understanding
of being human and of being sexual... The way forward needs to be about love,
joy and celebration of our humanity; of our creation in the image of God, of
our belonging to Christ - all of us, without exception, without exclusion.
It brings me back to my reading of the Ethiopian eunuch in
Acts 8 - returning from what would have been a marginalising experience at the
temple in Jerusalem and full of urgent questions about his reading of Isaiah 53.
I’m certain it is not just or even chiefly a story of an intellectual
question (‘who is Isaiah speaking about?’) receiving a satisfactory academic answer
(‘this is how we understand the ministry of Jesus’) and thus provoking a
religious response (‘what then prevents me from being baptised?’).
It is a story of a painful reality (of emasculation and religious exclusion) encountering Gospel possibilities (‘don’t let the eunuch say I’m just
a dry tree’ comes in the same part of Isaiah) which opens up new life itself (‘and
he went on his way rejoicing’).
The picture was taken in St Nicolas’, Great Coates after the
children had left last week.
No comments:
Post a Comment